Working brief
Decisions to settle before approval
Recognition method affects card design, reader position, print tolerance, cost, robustness and the user interaction. The purpose of this page is to make the buyer's next decision explicit and give the project team a shared review point before cost, tooling or production commitments.
- Card insertion or surface reading
- Reader geometry and tolerance
- Printed code visibility
- Recognition-speed target
What the review should return
A useful review does more than confirm that the project is possible. It records the assumptions, files, risks and approvals that control the next milestone.
- Recognition comparison
- Print constraints
- Prototype plan
- Pilot acceptance criteria
Evidence buyers should request
These items prevent the page from becoming a generic marketing claim. They should be current, relevant to this product decision and available for review at the appropriate project stage.
- Functional demo
- Recognition-rate test
- Printed samples
- Pilot results
How this fits the project
Talking-card systems fail when artwork, audio, firmware and printed codes use different naming. A controlled content map keeps publishers, translators, voice talent, engineers and printers on the same version. For this decision, the team should confirm ownership, reviewers and exit criteria before moving to the next stage.
The downloadable or emailed plan records working assumptions only. Final engineering, quotation, compliance, intellectual-property and schedule commitments belong in the reviewed project scope and signed agreement.